tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3301757140313310161.post7162999981699633204..comments2024-03-14T14:46:53.095+00:00Comments on Nigel Fisher's Brigg Blog: SHOULD THEY HAVE TO ASK?NIGEL FISHERhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105982962344084267noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3301757140313310161.post-69267752991881417732008-12-02T16:33:00.000+00:002008-12-02T16:33:00.000+00:00Nigel - I have every sympathy for any injured serv...Nigel - I have every sympathy for any injured service personnel and I certainly do not want to devalue any attempt to gain extra sponsorship for an Bene. Fund - whether army, RN or RAF....BUT I am confused by Major Gen Sir E offers the specific example of Sgt Paddy. Obviously, Sgt Paddy is severely disabled and to me would automatically qualify for a free car (insurance, tax and servicing included) under the Mobility Scheme. Car exchange every 3 years. Car can be driven by disabled person, or nominated person on behalf of such a person.<BR/>So why does Major Gen Sir E seem to believe that the ABF should supply him a vehicle - this seems like a poor allocation of funds as the ABF is paying for something that Sgt P would otherwise get free. Any answers?Ken Harrisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03338820577495271552noreply@blogger.com